Splash Damage Archives

Insights into Bethesda's Decision Not to Use Unreal Engine for Starfield In the dynamic world of gaming, the selection of an appropriate engine can significantly influence the success of a game. Recently, discussions have ignited about Bethesda's choice of using their in-house Creation Engine for the development of their forthcoming space adventure, Starfield, rather than opting for the widely-utilized Unreal Engine. This choice, as some have observed, has led to certain noticeable inconsistencies in the gaming experience. Below, we delve deep into the discussions surrounding this choice, examining the insights provided by seasoned game developers. A Detailed Look at the Ongoing Conversation on Gaming Engines Recently, the gaming community witnessed a surge in conversations centered on the engines powering their favorite games, triggered by observations made about the newly launched science-fiction adventure, Starfield. Some players have noted a few hiccups in the game's performance, including issues with NPC navigation and certain disconnects between various elements of the game's vast universe. These discussions, spurred in part by a post from Digital Foundry analyst John Linneman on Twxter, have seen contributions from both fans and seasoned developers alike. While some fans, particularly those in the PlayStation community where Starfield remains unavailable, have taken this opportunity to gloat, others have sought to understand the complexities behind the game engine decision, diving into thoughtful exchanges with experienced developers. The Perspective of Game Developers Within this fervent discussion, Giuseppe Navarria, a prominent figure in the gaming industry serving as the tech design director at Splash Damage, weighed in with a balanced viewpoint. Navarria expressed a clear appreciation for the Unreal Engine but highlighted the nuanced reasons behind Bethesda's choice to stick with their proprietary Creation Engine. According to Navarria, Bethesda's longstanding codebase is intricately designed to support expansive open-world RPGs such as Starfield. It houses years of accumulated technology, including sophisticated quest systems and mechanisms for managing and serializing items, components that are pivotal to the rich gaming experience that Bethesda aims to offer. This wealth of technology is tuned to handle CPU-heavy operations, a characteristic commonly associated with large-scale RPGs. Transitioning to a new engine, as Navarria pointed out, would necessitate a complete overhaul of these existing systems. Moreover, the current features of the Unreal Engine might not fully align with the demands of a game of Starfield's magnitude. It's also critical to note that the development of Starfield commenced before Epic Games introduced several of the new features that the Unreal Engine currently boasts, making a shift in technology a complex and potentially unsuitable choice at this stage of development. The Evolution of Bethesda's Creation Engine The Creation Engine, Bethesda's proprietary software, has seen continuous improvements since its inception in 2011. Despite criticisms often levied against it for being dated, it remains a robust and customizable choice for the developer, allowing for a tailored approach to game creation that accommodates the complex, expansive worlds that are a hallmark of Bethesda games. As the conversations unfold, it is apparent that the choice of engine involves a complex interplay of various factors, including the specific demands of the game, the existing technological infrastructure, and the timeline of development. Bethesda's decision to stick with the Creation Engine demonstrates a commitment to leveraging their specialized knowledge and experience to offer a gaming experience that meets their high standards, even in the face of criticism. Conclusion As the gaming community continues to explore and discuss the nuances behind the development of Starfield, it offers a window into the complexities and considerations that drive the choices game developers make. Through the insights shared by industry professionals like Giuseppe Navarria, it becomes evident that the selection of a game engine is a multifaceted decision, influenced by a range of factors including technological compatibility and development timelines. While the discussion fosters a deeper understanding of the gaming industry's intricacies, it also encourages players and enthusiasts to appreciate the depth of expertise and consideration that goes into crafting expansive gaming worlds like that of Starfield. It serves as a reminder that the journey of game development is a meticulous process, where every choice is weighed with great consideration to offer players a gaming experience that is both engaging and immersive. Also Read:

Hi, I'm TheBadGamer

Splash Damage

Starfield: Why Bethesda Didn’t Opt for Unreal Engine