How Battlefield Can Counteract Call of Duty’s Growing Dominance

In the dynamic world of AAA first-person shooters (FPS), the rivalry between the Battlefield and Call of Duty franchises has taken some significant turns. Initially, the Battlefield series was the prime destination for enthusiasts seeking grand-scale warfare experiences. However, the franchise’s recent slips have paved the way for Call of Duty to carve out a substantial chunk of its audience. This article dissects the transition in this rivalry and discusses potential strategies Battlefield can implement to reclaim its stature.

Recent Struggles of the Battlefield Franchise

The Battlefield series has witnessed both triumphant and troubling periods throughout the last several console generations. Initially gaining a strong foothold with successful releases like Battlefield 3 and Battlefield: Bad Company 2, the franchise stumbled significantly with Battlefield 4. This edition was marked by bugs and serious netcode issues, persisting for several months post-release. Despite stabilizing over time and bouncing back with Battlefield 1, the series encountered further setbacks with the historically inaccurate representation in Battlefield 5 and the failed Battle Royale attempt with Firestorm. The recent launch of Battlefield 2042 seems to have hit a new low, significantly affecting the franchise’s reputation and player base.

Call of Duty’s Strategy to Expand its Audience

In contrast, Call of Duty adopted a timely strategy to expand its appeal and win over a larger segment of the gaming community. The reboot of the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare series in 2019 marked a significant shift in this strategy. This reboot featured not only a realistic campaign experience but also introduced the Ground War, a large-scale warfare mode incorporating elements traditionally found in Battlefield games. The successful implementation of these elements, coupled with a live service and seasonal system ensuring the frequent release of new maps, has allowed Call of Duty to position itself as a comprehensive package offering both large and small-scale warfare experiences.

Furthermore, the introduction of Call of Duty: Warzone, a free-to-play battle royale offering, has significantly bolstered the franchise’s standing. With large maps, vehicular elements, and an accessible entry point, it has managed to siphon a portion of the audience that primarily sought large-scale warfare experiences in Battlefield.

Potential Strategies for Battlefield to Reclaim its Footing

Observing the shifting dynamics, it becomes evident that for Battlefield to regain its competitive footing, adopting a strategy akin to Call of Duty’s recent approach appears logical. Initially, this would involve the integration of both small and large-scale warfare experiences within the Battlefield series. Drawing from the positive reception of Battlefield 3’s Close Quarters expansion, which showcased that infantry-only maps could thrive in the series, a similar approach can be revisited and expanded upon.

Furthermore, Battlefield has the opportunity to accentuate its unique offerings, particularly focusing on vehicular combat involving jets and tanks and enhanced destruction mechanics. By capitalizing on these aspects, which currently lack in Call of Duty’s large-scale maps, Battlefield can potentially carve out a distinctive and appealing niche.

In conclusion, the time is ripe for Battlefield to learn and adapt from Call of Duty’s successful strategies, thus fostering a balanced and healthy competition between these two FPS giants. With the correct strategies in place, Battlefield can stage a comeback, presenting gamers with enriched and diverse gaming experiences.

Also Read: